triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SUV

To: "Scott A. Roberts" <herald1200@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: SUV
From: "jack williams" <jackandangie@attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:36:00 -0600
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <001801c2d2e3$c4b683e0$6500a8c0@dellpc> <a05200f0dba70b9b56ca4@[192.168.123.151]> <02c701c2d31e$4255e400$6401a8c0@attbi.com> <00cc01c2d31f$ba185940$7f202d44@medfrd01.nj.comcast.net>
"You've just exposed the classic modus operandi of most liberals: Make rules
for everyone ELSE to follow, while exempting yourself from those same rules.
Liberals frequently find reasons why THEY shouldn't have to follow the
rules, but they'll NEVER accept anyone else's reasons for doing the same."

hmmmmmmmm wonder where I heard that

Jack W.

ps not that I agree or disagree with everything thats going on, just playing
devils advocate.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott A. Roberts" <herald1200@comcast.net>
To: "jack williams" <jackandangie@attbi.com>; "Pete & Aprille Chadwell"
<pandachadwell@mac.com>
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: SUV


> Yes, but, we are responsible enough to have and handle such items, and
have
> not used them on our own people for extermination purposes. Saddam is a
> volatile maniac. Our leaders may be nuts(and I do like W) but we have
checks
> which keep them from using such items and usually out of office in the
first
> place.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jack williams" <jackandangie@attbi.com>
> To: "Pete & Aprille Chadwell" <pandachadwell@mac.com>
> Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: SUV
>
>
> > Hmmmmmmmmm. hate to play devils advocate, but sounds a bit like telling
> Iraq
> > they can't have weapons of mass destruction while we create some of the
> most
> > hideous methods of killing people right here in the good old USA. Not
that
> I
> > think Saddam is a saint, but hey...
> >
> > Jack W.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pete & Aprille Chadwell" <pandachadwell@mac.com>
> > To: "Triumphs Mailing List" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: SUV
> >
> >
> > > >We drive cars that may have no "useful" purpose; we do so because we
> like
> > them
> > > >and enjoy them. In the next breath we dare criticize others for
driving
> > what
> > > >they choose to drive.
> > >
> > > Woo Hoo! Way to go, Peter!
> > >
> > > You've just exposed the classic modus operandi of most liberals: Make
> > > rules for everyone ELSE to follow, while exempting yourself from
> > > those same rules. Liberals frequently find reasons why THEY shouldn't
> > > have to follow the rules, but they'll NEVER accept anyone else's
> > > reasons for doing the same. And I'm sorry if that ticks some of you
> > > off, but this RIDICULOUS SUV debate is a CLASSIC illustration of it.
> > >
> > > Damn, I just LOVE it when people tell it like it is! Thanks, Peter!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pete Chadwell
> > > 1973 TR6

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>