triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Stromberg vs. SU's

To: "Bill Haenlin" <whaenlin@carolina.rr.com>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Stromberg vs. SU's
From: "Ken Gano" <triumphs@mcleodusa.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:52:11 -0800
Webers :)

Kg


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Bill Haenlin
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:04 PM
To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Stromberg vs. SU's

Ok, now I'm in a bit of a quandry and ready to start a Hatfield and
McCoy battle on the list.  I've been offerered several sets of Zenith
Stromberg 175 CD like those that were originally on the car (65 TR4a)
and well, too be honest I was pursuing the SU's because that's what
everyone else seems to do, replace bergs with SU's, so since I really
don't know and am not knowledgeable enough about the carbs and such, why
would I want SU's over Strombergs or vice versa??  Which would I be
better off with?  Pros Cons??


Bill Haenlin

whaenlin@carolina.rr.com

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>