triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Insurance Question (long, part 2)

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Insurance Question (long, part 2)
From: DANMAS@aol.com
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:19:38 EST
Stated Value Insurance (It's Not What You Think)
by Bradley Flippin 
Instead of purchasing a standard indemnity insurance policy for your classic 
or antique car, did you decide to pay an additional premium and purchase a 
stated value policy? Anything to prevent having to hassle with the claims 
people. Right? After all, your agent said they would pay the stated amount in 
the event of a total loss. Right? WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! If any of this sounds 
familiar you may have been mislead by one of the most widespread 
misconceptions that exists today in the automobile insurance industry. 
BACKGROUND 
In 1985 Mr. J. Bradley Flippin of Centreville, Virginia, purchased a $3,000 
slated value policy from Nationwide for his car. Just to he sure there was no 
misunderstanding, he asked the agent to be very specific as to how a claim 
would be handled in the event of a total loss. The agent reassured him he 
would receive the stated value amount in the event of a total loss. "You mean 
if I have a total loss they will write me a check for $3,000? 
Mr. Flippin asked. Well, not exactly, replied the agent. You will have to 
prove you have that much in the car. Then, yes, they will pay the $3,000. I 
recommend, however; you keep all your receipts and be ready to submit them if 
the need ever arises. That seemed fair enough. Mr. Flippin was required to 
bring the car by the agent's office so he could inspect it and photograph it 
for the file., Mr. Flippin paid about $205 for six months of basic coverage, 
including the $3,000 stated value declaration (A standard indemnity policy on 
the same car would have cost only about $175). 
CLAIM TIME 
Mr. Flippin neglected to watch the green left turn light at an intersection 
and turned directly in the path of an oncoming car. The impact was so great 
his head shattered the passenger's side window. (Moral: Wear your seat 
belts.) The claims adjuster declared the car a total loss, so Mr. Flippin 
sent him a copy of all the receipts for the restoration work, which to date 
had totaled about $5,500. The adjuster said he was willing to settle for 
$900. "Nine hundred dollars!" exclaimed Mr. Flippin. "What happened to the 
$3,000 stated value for which I had been paying additional premiums?" 
"Oh, I don't know anything about that. I only settle the claims. You will 
have to talk to someone else about that," was his reply. But he did say he 
would be willing to consider any other information that might be provided to 
him. "If I can get an appraisal showing the car was worth $3,000, would that 
be enough?" The agent replied with, "Well, we will certainly take it into 
consideration." He was about as non-committal as one could be. 
RESEARCH 
At this point Mr. Flippin decided to do some research. He began by reading 
his policy, which nobody ever reads (Have you read yours?) The basic policy 
said Nationwide would pay "... the actual cash value of the property .. at 
time of loss ..." (This is the way all standard indemnity policies read.) 
Nationwide's Virginia Endorsement 2004 (Stated Amount Insurance) replaced the 
wording in the "Limit of Liability" section with words saying they would pay 
the lesser of "... the stated amount in the declaration or the actual cash 
value of the stolen or damaged property... The words "at time of loss were 
not there. They had been dropped. This appeared to he reasonable because the 
value of the car had been agreed to in advance. Thus, the value of the 
property at the time of loss was really not an issue (or so he thought). 
The Nationwide claims adjuster, and Nationwide itself, would have nothing to 
do with that interpretation. Although no one could explain why the words were 
missing, Nationwide maintained that it really did not matter. Their position 
was simple: Nowhere in the contract (policy) did it state Nationwide would 
pay the stated amount in the event of a total loss. Mr. Flippin considered 
this wording to be ambiguous and, although the claims adjuster agreed, he 
would not change his position. 
STATED AMOUNT 
Additional research revealed there are, in fact, two types of stated polices. 
One is a stated amount policy in which the premium is based on an amount 
stated by the insured. Losses, however, are still based on the actual cash 
value (ACV) of the property at the tune of loss, but not to exceed the stated 
amount. To pay the stated amount automatically would create a moral hazard in 
that policy holders could overvalue their cars, thus making a profit. This is 
contrary to the basic principle of indemnity which is to restore a person to 
the position they were in before the loss. (Mr. Flippin contends, however, 
Nationwide effectively removed the moral hazard by having their agent inspect 
the car prior to issuing the policy.) 
STATED VALUE 
The other is a "stated value" policy, which is a true valued type of policy 
where both parties agree, in advance, as to the value of the property. In the 
event of a total loss, the company will pay the full face value of the 
policy. It turns out this is an Inland Marine type of policy generally used 
with works of art, boats and other marine equipment. There are a few 
companies, however, that do offer it as an automobile policy. This difference 
maybe the reason for the wide misconceptions about stated value policies. Mr. 
Flippin asked eleven different Nationwide agents how the company would settle 
a stated value policy. None of them corrected him by saying they were 
actually stated amount policies, five of them said the company would pay the 
full stated amount and five of them did not know. Only one actually knew the 
company would not pay the stated amount in the event of a total loss. He said 
he chose not to sell that type of policy because the insured pays an 
additional premium and receives no additional protection. In fact the insured 
receives less protection. The standard indemnity policy pays the ACV at the 
time of the loss with no limit on the company's liability. The stated amount 
policy still pays the ACV at the time of the loss, but the company's 
liability is limited to the stated amount. For example: Assume a car has an 
ACV at time of loss of $10,000. For an $8,000 stated amount policy, the 
company would only pay $8,000, where they would pay the full $10,000 under a 
standard indemnity policy. The insured pays an additional premium for the 
"privilege" of limiting the insurance company's liability. 

///
///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Insurance Question (long, part 2), DANMAS <=