Subject: | Re: "Rover may be a Triumph" |
---|---|
From: | Matt Ritter <prdesign@ix.netcom.com> |
Date: | Wed, 08 Mar 2000 11:24:14 -0500 |
Cc: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
References: | <D532BD4F055ED2119E8300A0C9E1C8CE40F75D@EDAXNJ05> |
The Opinions following only relate to the U.S. Well if they tied Rover cars and Land Rovers together they would have a good name recognition. The problem with any british name in the states is the reliability reputation. Lets face it the states believes that any british car will break down when you look at it wrong. That being said the most known brit name that BMW owns is MG. However if they used MG the would need a sports car to lead the charge. Matt Ritter 71 240Z ( rustoration hell, turbo on its way) 69 TR6 ( I don't know why it doesn't work, do you ) 97 Cherokee ( its only been off road once ) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: "Rover may be a Triumph", Westerdale, Bob |
---|---|
Next by Date: | FW: Metric Conversion Chart **HUMOR** LBC - not really..., Musson, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | RE: "Rover may be a Triumph", Westerdale, Bob |
Next by Thread: | To anybody who remembers my steering shimmy, Beth & Ken |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |