triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Matching Numbers" - semi LBC question!

To: Chip19474@aol.com
Subject: Re: "Matching Numbers" - semi LBC question!
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 09:43:09 -0700
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <24.4bd4d1.25bb1303@aol.com>
I vote for the first one (an exact match with what rolled off the
assembly line)

Joe

Chip19474@aol.com wrote:
> 
> List,
> 
> I was off-list since Wednesday - business trip - but had a chance to strike
> up some conversation with classic American muscle car enthusiaists on common
> ground stuff like powder coating, waxes, POR 15, etc.
> 
> I explained how we (LBCr's) can get a BMHIT Build Certificate which includes
> the correct serial numbers for engine and body as the car was built.  So, I
> asked these guys:  "In the American classic car world is this feature (engine
> & body numbers on record) what the term "Matching Numbers" means"?  You see
> that phrase "MAtching Numbers" usually attached to "For Sale" ads for 50's,
> 60's, 70's corvettes, GTOs, mustangs, etc....
> 
> They (my little group of muscle car mania) couldn't agree on an answer.  A
> few said yes - "matching numbers" means that the engine and body are exactly
> what rolled off the assembly line - all together - when that specific vehicle
> was built.  The other viewpoint was that "matching numbers" means that the
> engine and body match what the VIN describes in generic definition
> only....i.e., if the VIN says that the engine was a 3-2BBL carb 389 cu in V8
> and that's what in the car (even if it isn't the original 389 V8) then the
> owner has "matching numbers".
> 
> What say the list...anyone have experience in this area?
> 
> Thx,
> 
> Chip
> 
> Chip Krout
> '76 TR6 CF57822U (restoration underway)
> '70 Spitfire Mk3 FDU78512L (resting for the winter)

-- 
"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
 -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>