triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system

To: TR List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: we don't need no steenkin' navigation system
From: Dave Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 09:50:34 -0400
Cc: "Michael D. Porter (TR)" <mdporter@rt66.com> charset=ISO-8859-1
Michael D. Porte writes:

Andrew Mace wrote:
>
> Per the following news item: A show of hands, please, for all of you
whose
> Triumphs were affected yesterday...I thought as much. ;-)
>
> ************************************************************************
> NAVIGATION SYSTEMS FAIL IN SOME JAPANESE CARS
> In Japan, the navigation systems using the satellite-based Global
> Positioning System failed to operate correctly in some Japanese cars
> yesterday, because they had been designed to count to only 1,024 weeks
and
> when the maximum was reached on Sunday the clocks reset to zero.  Pioneer

Hmmm... I find this a most curious explanation for the problem. If the
week counter was absolute, i.e., the device began counting weeks from
the time it was first turned on, that would mean that Japanese cars have
had GPS navigation for 19.69 years... perhaps they meant days....

Cheers.

------------------------------

Michael, 

The problem isn't with the individual GPS device but with the 
system as a whole.  Satelite location and the resulatant 
calculations change over time and the algorithm needs to 
know what the time is to determing proper location.  The 
GPS system was initially set up in 1980 and the weeks 
are counted from that initial date.  Regargless of when the 
receiver was built.

But this is just some Techno-nerd stuff and doesn't belong
on this list.

Dave Massey (Techno-nerd)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>