triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE:Spreadsheet

To: Shawn Mann <shaw.mon@worldnet.att.net>, Triumph List <triumphs@autox.team.net> charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: RE:Spreadsheet
From: Tony Rhodes <ARhodes@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 09:25:30 -0400
Message text written by INTERNET:triumphs-owner@autox.team.net
>Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:49:32 -0700
From: Shawn Mann <shaw.mon@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: TR6 rear wheel camber probs


Listfolk,

I have seemingly hit a snag in the suspension rebuild of my 1970 TR6. 
The details: complete poly rebush, Moss comp springs, Spax in front, 
Apple HD shocks in rear.  The problem:  the right rear wheel is 
exhibiting noticeable positive camber, and ride height is approximately 
one inch higher on the right rear. I have checked the spring pad to see 
if I failed to seat the spring well and it was OK.  There is no apparent 
collision damage to either the trailing arm or the frame, the car tracks 
straight when viewed from a distance, and the trailing arm mounting 
brackets are in the right places (two notches on outside, one on inside 
 - both with notches facing up). The car had the same problem with the 30 
year old stock springs that I replaced, but I had assumed that it was 
due to uneven, driver-side-only spring sag.  

I have heard mention that the trailing arm mounting brackets can be 
inverted or exchanged with one of the late model three notch brackets, 
creating several different possible combinations, and that a spread 
sheet of all the combinations (with resultant effects??) might be 
available on someone's webpage.  Anyone with any clues or suggestions 
about what to do about this?  FYI, left rear is behaving nicely with -.5 
degree camber with a full tank, no passengers, right rear is at +2 
degree. I know I'll probably have to pull the trailing arm and change 
the brackets, but I'd like to have an idea what to try rather than 
extensive (and time consuming, and frustrating) trial and error.
<



Shawn, I have that info if you need it.
It was posted to the list a while back and I just looked at it
this past weekend.  Strangely enough, the 1, 2, 3 up, down factors do
not follow the natural progression you would expect, but I have it all
laid out in a spreadsheet/ascii for anybody who needs it....

-Tony

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>