triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE: Tax on internet services...

To: "Andrew Lindeman" <drfaustus@london.crosswinds.net>
Subject: Re: RE: Tax on internet services...
From: "Andy" <amdixon@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:50:57 -0500 (EST)
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
Also, The Nations Governers met at the White House today and had big 
discussions about Sales Taxes on internet purchases. They feel they are 
losing mega-bucks.
Andy D.


On 02/23/99 11:44 PM Andrew Lindeman said...
>
>You're right... The phone company is lobbying in my local area, not 
national.
>However HR 514 is a REALLY bad wireless privacy bill that tries to make 
listening
>illegal (even possibly police scanners), istead of enforcing much neede 
encryption.
>
>Andy L.
>
>It was written:
>> Andy,
>>   Are you sure it's HR 514?
>> 
>> I checked out what was available
>> through http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/cong009.html
>> and HR 514 looked like it was dealing with
>> something else.(Wireless Privacy)
>> 
>> If there is such a bill, I'd like
>> to know which one it is.  I did a search
>> on telecommunications and I didn't see
>> a relevant one.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net
>> > [mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Andrew 
Lindeman
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 3:36 PM
>> > To: triumphs@autox.team.net
>> > Subject: Tax on internet services...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > While there is no proposed tax on internet service, there is 
>> > something we should
>> > be concerned with in congress right now.
>> > 
>> > The phone companies are lobbying (again) to re-classify ISP 
>> > cals as long
>> > distance.  The bill is/was HR 514.
>> > 
>> > Andy L.
>> > 
>> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>