triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Engine conversions

To: "Eric A. Yates" <eyates@earth.nwu.edu>
Subject: Re: Engine conversions
From: Malcolm Walker <walker05@camosun.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: spitfires@Autox.Team.Net, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Eric A. Yates wrote:

> I have a question about engine conversions: why do people do it? I am
> curious as to why folks make changes to something as fundamental to a car's
> character as its engine.

You're probably going to get a big rant from DANMAS on this subject.  But
here's my small rant for the meantime:

Some of us like doing the impossible, or the improbable.  Sometimes it's
circumstance- while it is possible to get a small car to "go" by tweaking
and massaging the engine, it costs a lot of money and they wear out really
quickly.

If, in the quest for MORE POWER (arr arr arr), you decide to place a large
engine in a small car, then you get a few advantages: more reliability,
smoother running, and MORE POWER (arr arr arr).

Take my brother's two beaters: an 81 Camaro (w/ 267 V8) and a 74 Ventura
(w/ 350 BigBlock V8)  The camaro is smaller and lighter, but guess which
one goes faster?  (hint: the ugly one).  He wanted to pop the big block
into his Camaro (small block) but we axed that plan as it would require
major modification to a car worth less than $1500.  In this case, it's
smarter to find someone who already has a big-block Camaro.

But with our LBCs, sometimes something unique is required.  I'd love to
stick a Lotus 1.8 mill into my Chevette.  Why not buy a lotus?  (big
reason: I don't fit in Lotuses).  Also, I'd have a Chevette capable of
some pretty wild stuff.  heh heh, heh heh, cool.

> I am not a person who places a major priority on originality, but I would
> hesitate to make such a drastic change to my car. If I wanted a Triumph
> with more power than my Spitfire, I'd get a TR6 or GT6. Probably the TR
> since I love top-down driving, but then again, a GT would be a cool
> compliment to my Spit. Either way, I'd seek out a car that has the larger
> engine rather than wedge one into my current ride.

Why is it drastic?  Is an engine really that much of the personality of a
car?  (Only to the driver, I'd say... and in that case, to each their own)

> On the other hand, a conversion like sticking a Chevy V8 in a TR6 seems
> strange to me. I respect the amount of work and effort that goes into such
> a conversion, and it is impressive to see the final product, but I wonder
> why the builder didn't start with an American car in the first place to
> build his hot rod. That way, the final product retains a certain amount of
> the character of the original car.

My favorite conversions are the ones whereby you can't tell it's been
done.  No loss, unless you really like gawking at what's under a car hood.

-Malcolm
* There is a FAQ for this list!  Its temporary home is:
http://www3.bc.sympatico.ca/walker/triumph/trfaq.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>