triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Legroom?

To: "fred thomas" <vafred@erols.com>, "Barry Schwartz" <bschwart@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Legroom?
From: "Lawrence R Zink" <zink@pdq.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 13:01:11 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
That's tacky, Fred. True, but tacky.
-----Original Message-----
From: fred thomas <vafred@erols.com>
To: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 1998 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Legroom?


>
>Barry Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> >If I
>> >were in your shoes I would look for a Triumph TR3 thru TR6 and even a
>> >TR7 but I would problably stay away from the Spits and GT6's. If it's
>> >a chore to get in the thing you tend to drive it less.
>> **************************************
>> Actually, I think you'll find that the interior dimensions are
practically
>> the same for the Spitfire and the TR4/6.  They share the same track
>> (front), and windscreen up thru the MK3,  and MK4 Spits are different
only
>> in that the windscreen was deepened about two inches.  I think the myth
>> perpetuates because the Spitfire appears outwardly, to be a smaller car
so
>> the assumption is that it's also smaller inside.  I would be willing to
bet
>> that the interior width dimensions for both cars are within an inch of
each
>> other-
>>
>> Barry Schwartz (San Diego) bschwart@pacbell.net
>> 72 V6 Spitfire (daily driver)
>> 70 GT6+ (when I don't drive the Spit)
>> 70 Spitfire
>
>Think of how many less divorces there would be for 1 inch.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>