triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MGB vs. Spitfire<3503CF2D.5230@xtra.co.nz>

To: Chris Rodgers <The.4.Rodgers@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: MGB vs. Spitfire<3503CF2D.5230@xtra.co.nz>
From: RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 11:44:00 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "Ackley, Aaron T" <ackleya@hq.7arcom.army.mil>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net, RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
References: <934B25448AE3D01182E70000C0FC00C868C79F@hq.7arcom.army.mil>

>Ackley, Aaron T wrote:
>>
>> I thought it was the windows....  ie one of the "selling points"
>> of that plane was the "picture window" arrangement,  and it was  these
>> that failed, due to a large glass surface area and poor sealing
>>
>       aaron

>I still reckon it was one of the best looking things to ever fly.

>Remind anyone of Mg, all try-hard sex appeal and no substance??

Sorry about this but:

What have an MG and a Used tampon got in common?

There all red and every c*** has one!

Appologise's once again. :-)

Rich

>Chris Rodgers

>MG disliker
 ^^^^^^^^^^^

Hmmm, I had a sneaky suspiscion that you didn't like 'em!!!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: MGB vs. Spitfire<3503CF2D.5230@xtra.co.nz>, RICHARD.JACKSON <=