To: | Chris Rodgers <The.4.Rodgers@xtra.co.nz> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: MGB vs. Spitfire<3503CF2D.5230@xtra.co.nz> |
From: | RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK |
Date: | Mon, 09 Mar 1998 11:44:00 +0000 (GMT) |
Cc: | "Ackley, Aaron T" <ackleya@hq.7arcom.army.mil>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net, RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK |
References: | <934B25448AE3D01182E70000C0FC00C868C79F@hq.7arcom.army.mil> |
>Ackley, Aaron T wrote: >> >> I thought it was the windows.... ie one of the "selling points" >> of that plane was the "picture window" arrangement, and it was these >> that failed, due to a large glass surface area and poor sealing >> > aaron >I still reckon it was one of the best looking things to ever fly. >Remind anyone of Mg, all try-hard sex appeal and no substance?? Sorry about this but: What have an MG and a Used tampon got in common? There all red and every c*** has one! Appologise's once again. :-) Rich >Chris Rodgers >MG disliker ^^^^^^^^^^^ Hmmm, I had a sneaky suspiscion that you didn't like 'em!!! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: David Hill-2.5PI<3503CF1A.2F32@xtra.co.nz>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: TR3 fuel pump, Jay Wassall |
Previous by Thread: | Re: David Hill-2.5PI<3503CF1A.2F32@xtra.co.nz>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
Next by Thread: | Spitfire Hard Top Parts Availablity, Brad Kahler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |