triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SB-42 Classic Car Smog<01BC7A37.64B673C0@ppp0A.academy.net.au>

To: derek evans <derekev@academy.net.au>
Subject: Re: SB-42 Classic Car Smog<01BC7A37.64B673C0@ppp0A.academy.net.au>
From: RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 09:52:32 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: "Triumph List (E-mail)" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>, RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
>hi all,
>living in australia, it's not really for me to comment specifically on sb-42.
>there is a point hovever that i rarely see raised when the discussion of older 
>vehicles and their 'extra' air pollution is brought up.
>if you put and old car in the crusher (or worse, let it rust away) and buy a 
>new one, many megawatt hours of energy are expended by the factories involved 
>in its production.  this energy ultimately comes from a power station which 
>creates its own smoke and contributes to global warming.
>is there anyone on the list capable of calculating a ballpark 'energy value' 
>for an old car.  this might raise a few eyebrows next time the government and 
>the media get on the 'lets get all the old cars off the road' band wagon.
>the best way to recycle is to keep using what you've got!

I remember reading somewhere(don't ask me though, it was a long time ago) that
about 75% of the energy used by a car is in it's production.  Don't know how
right that is, but it sounds good for our cause eh!!! ;-)

Rich

>adelaide (we want our grand prix back)

We've still got ours up the road at Silverstone, but I'm damned if I'll pay
about 70 quid to stand in a field when I can see it better at home, who needs
atmosphere!!! :-)

ps, anyone here the results for Le Mans this weekend, I saw bugger all on telly
about it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: SB-42 Classic Car Smog<01BC7A37.64B673C0@ppp0A.academy.net.au>, RICHARD.JACKSON <=