triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tranny Oils GL5 vs GL4

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Tranny Oils GL5 vs GL4
From: Joe Worsley <worsley@ebicom.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:25:47 -0700
References: <19970421154444397.AAA229@eng-bschwartz>
Barry Schwartz wrote:
> 
> With all the controversy about the newer GL5 oils causing problems with
> brass, I just can't buy it.  (donning flame retardant suit)  I just finished
> completely rebuilding a world class Borg Warner T5 - 5 speed that will be
> going into the V6 Spitfire to replace the aging T4 - 4 speed.  The T5 has
> carbon fiber synchros on 1 thru 4 gears, but guess what.  Number 5 is
> regular old brass, same as used in the old Triumph boxes.  I seriously doubt
> that GL5 would be recommend for use in these transmissions if there was a
> problem with compatibility.  As for copper as used in the rear end thrust
> washers I can't say (still doubtfull) and as for overdrives I suspect it's
> that the new GL5 and synthetic oils are TOO slippery for proper operation,
> not that they will degrade materials used in these transmission/rear ends.
> Just my own personal observations lead me to believe that if there was any
> danger, the manufacturer would place a warning on the bottle stating these
> oils may cause material failure in older transmissions requiring GL4, or
> transmissions with brass, or copper components.  There is a liability
> question that most manufacturers, I would think, would not want to tackle -
> for me, I'll utilize the advantages of the newer oils.
> 
> Barry Schwartz
> Bschwartz@encad.com  (San Diego)
> 72-V6 Spitfire (daily driver)
> 70 GT6+ (when I don't drive the Spit)
> 70 Spitfire (body repair almost done)
> 

I have noticed several GL5 lubricant containers with the statement that 
the contents were not corrosive!!  Maybee they have changed the 
formulation??

Joe Worsley
80 TR8 DHC
Tupelo, MS

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>