triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: balist resistor (why)

To: Barry Schwartz <Bschwartz@encad.com>
Subject: Re: balist resistor (why)
From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:22:48 -0500 (EST)
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
> Jake writes:
> I am wondering if a 73 spit needs a ballist resistor.  The car starts and
> runs great but there is no ballist resisitor.  Do I really need one.
> The>comm numbers are FM1531U
> ***************************************************************************
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997, Barry Schwartz wrote:

> Chances are, unless the previous owner changed the coil to a non-ballasted
> coil you will need a ballast resister....

Yes, and no. Yes, assuming it is the OEM or OEM-type replacement coil, 
you need a ballast resistor. No, you probably don't need to add one. IMS, 
this vintage of Spitfire (U.S. version anyway) had the ballast resistor 
"built in" to the wiring harness; there is no external ballast resistor 
that one could point to and say 'there it is'.

At least that's what I recall from a 1973 Spitfire that used to hang 
around awhile back! ;-)

--Andy

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Andrew Mace, President and                *
*   10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant *
* Vintage Triumph Register                  *
* amace@unix2.nysed.gov                     *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>