At 12:49 PM 12/19/96 -0800, you wrote:
>hey
>
>How do we let Quentin know we strongly support him?
>
>we need all the assistance we can get.
>
>Gary Oehrle
>
Maybe someone who lives in CA could see if he has an E-Mail address.If
everyone on this and theMG board mailed him it should get his attention.
>> From triumphs-owner@autox.team.net Thu Dec 19 11:18:00 1996
>> X-From: Umail1 Thu Dec 19 11:17 PST 1996
>mail1.lsil.com with ESMTP id LAA06284
> (8.6.12/IDA-1.6 for <oehrle@lsil.com>); Thu, 19 Dec 1996 11:17:33 -0800
>> X-Authentication-Warning: triumph.cs.utah.edu: majordom set sender to
owner-triumphs
>using -f
>> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:52:54 -0800
>> From: kboetzer@auspex.com (Ken Boetzer)
>> To: triumphs@autox.team.net, ingate@shiseis.com
>> Subject: Re: Smog II in Cal, again. Sigh. (Good news!)
>> Content-Md5: ZgcWSC7rohpZSLZE1YOCEw==
>>
>>
>> > All,
>> > Seems Quentin Kopp (a Sacramento weenie) is behind a measure
>> > to return California smog laws to the way they were originally written,
>> > with a rolling 25-year window. The first law took effect in 1981, which is
>> > why cars 1966 and newer are tested. The next year it was supposed to be
>> > 1967, then 1968, and so on, but bureaucrats being what they are, the 1966
>> > date stuck. He's going to try to change it in '97, effective in '98,
meaning
>> > that only cars '73 and newer would be tested, and then within two
years, we'd
>> > (TR6 and older) never have to worry again.
>> >
>> > Anyone heard this?
>> >
>> > Shane Ingate in San Diego
>> >
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Yes I have heard this. Quentin is a San Francisco plitico (weenie) who I find
>> myself agreeing with on an alrmingly large number of issues. I also agree
this
>> will address smog in a more rational fashion even though there are a
substantial
>> number of cars of the old variety. It seems the number driven regularly
is low
>> and as such not a significant contributor to the smog problem. Let's hope he
>> is successful.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ken Boetzer
>
>
|