On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Vincenti, Ross wrote:
> Okay, okay. Now I'm confused. Andy Mace advises that the rear leaf swing
> spring on the later Spits is the same length as the earlier non-swing spring
> Spits, however the axles are longer (no dispute about that last part).
Well, almost. What I said was that the swing-spring was the same,
whether used with the "shorter" or "longer" axles. But...
> So am I to understand that I CAN bolt in a later swing spring with
> absolutely NO other modifications to my Mk I Spit?
Basically, yes, you can. As I noted yesterday in my answer to Larry, you
really need only to block off the two now-redundant center stud holes on
top of the diff. Again, though, you really need to use the fatter front
sway bar that came on the swing-spring cars in order to help compensate
for the now softer, lower-roll-center rear suspension. If by NO
modification you mean no particular cutting, drilling or welding -- or
something completely reversible, you are correct. It's all bolt-in stuff.
> If it is the same length, then why longer axles?
The longer axles simply give a 2" wider track in the rear, for whatever
that usually gains you (or Pontiac, who has recently revived their
"Wide-Track" Pontiac advertising from the 50s/60s).
IN summary (thank goodness, he's almost through): the swing-spring
conversion is fairly quick, not too expensive, usually worthwhile and
COMPLETELY reversible -- especially if, somewhere down the road, someone
gives you one of those camber compensator thingies (also a completely
reversible modification!).
--Andy
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Andrew Mace e-mail: amace@unix2.nysed.gov *
* *
* Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet? *
* Man: Well, no... It's not so much of a jet, it's more your, er, *
* Triumph Herald engine with wings. *
* -- The Cut-price Airline Sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|