It seems my question wasn't clear enough because a lot of people though I
was expecting about 130 to 150 bhp only by fitting new carbs. I know that's
not realistic. So, here we go again:
Given the fact I blueprint the engine, increase the compression ration, fit
a fast-road cam, lighten the flywheel, etc. Whic carburation setup whould
you prefer. Webers or SUs? Two or three of each?
Ronald.
ps Below, you will find a copy of my original message.
----------
From: RLET
To: british-cars; triumphs
Subject: Webers or SUs, that's the question
Date: Monday, May 22, 1995 4:37PM
Hi all,
Allthough I'm still working on the chassis of my '67 MkI GT6, I'm planning
for an engine overhaul as well. While doing this I want to convert the
engine's carburation from Strombergs to either SU's or Webers. The reasons
for the conversion are:
My carbs need either rebuiling or replacing
I've heard Srtombergs are a pain in maintenance /reliability
Most important reason is that it seems Strombergs do not take other
engine mods as well as SUs or Webers.
The main idea is to get some more power out of the old 2 litre lump. I'm
aiming at something between 130 and 150 bhp and no I don't want to swap it
for a 2.5 litre unit. So, can anyone tell me whether my assumptions are
correct and if so, should I gor for the SUs or the Webers. Should I go for a
double or for a triple carb setup?
Suggestions anyone?
Ronald van der Let
Culemborg, The Netherlands
Ronald.vanderLet@utrecht.att.com
"Wouldn't such a trip take hours, dear? It's such an old car" as my mother
in law said about a 130 mile trip with my Lancia. I took her for a spin and
she's still recovering......
'78 Mercedes Benz 280CE ------ Daily workhorse with a drinking problem.
'67 Triumph GT6 ------ Undergoing nut and bolt restoration .You need to
travel at least 6 miles to see all the parts.
'70 Lancia Fulvia Coupe 1.3S Rallye ------ Lots of fun, but would you
believe those Lancia parts prices.
|