triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Starting car in neutral & (belt on)

Subject: Re: Starting car in neutral & (belt on)
From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 12:29:32 -0900 (PDT)
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net


On Sun, 21 May 1995 S1500@aol.com wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The recent thread on starting your car in neutral etc. reminded me
> of a "feature" on my '75 Spit.  While inspecting the tranny some
> time ago,  I discovered an extra switch attached near the gear
> selector.  This appeared to be <neutral-detection-switch>.
> ...Although disabled by a PO, it appears
> that you would have to have:
> a) your seat belt fastened
> b) you passenger's (if present) belt fastened. 
> c) tranny in neutral
> before you could start the car.  The passenger <seat-belt-switch>
> and the <seat-belt-neutral-switch> appear to have been deleted in
> the later '75s and onward.

> Bob Sykes
> 75, 78, 78 Spitfires

Ah, yes Bob. The immortal 1974 U.S. Federal seatbelt interlock. Mom had 
one on the Volvo she bought new that year. It actually worked for 
several years, one of the few reliable electric/electronic bits on that 
car. :-(

I had a 1974 Spitfire back around 1989-90. It, too, had the same sort of 
interlock. Unfortunately, after a while, the SMITHS module that 
controlled it became somewhat tempermental, finally to a point where the 
interlock became the ultimate safety device -- you couldn't start the 
car even if you, your passenger, your luggage and the tarp on the nearby 
woodpile were all properly strapped down. Bypassing the module with a 
nice little piece of wire from key switch to solenoid took care of the 
problem.

Sadly for us here in the USofA, some of these market-specific, 
short-term wiring nightmares were not as well documented in the workshop 
manuals as they might have been.

Andy Mace


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>