| To: | michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Tigers] Reduced diameter water pump pulley |
| From: | Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Oct 2013 01:35:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | "tigers@autox.team.net" <tigers@autox.team.net> |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | tigers@autox.team.net |
| References: | <2023150851.3795923.1381129502710.JavaMail.root@sz0058a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> <88B547A3616D485DBAEA6BD0A7B84CB6@ronpc1> <CANE47iRMuLVZ9R-K8z-ZvuoNbNpbk5fDbVdr6yvf8zcNgRKrXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAET8snWMSRv7fqM3nuayBSqrK4Fj4Sq6FqOuzxB4WOovp35cYA@mail.gmail.com> |
Seems like a poor fix given the compromise. A shroud and a sealed cross
member gap should be sufficient.
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, michael king wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8 October 2013 08:44, Owain Lloyd <owain.lloyd@gmail.com<javascript:_e({},
> 'cvml', 'owain.lloyd@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Gene,
>>
>> What's the motivation? I could understand _increased_ diameter for high
>> revving engines, but why smaller? More water flow is unlikely to aid
>> cooling and could make it worse.
>>
>> The reduced pulley increases the fan speed at idle (well across all.. but
> idle is the focus) which increases the amount of air moved through the
> radiator at that problem point when the car is stationary.
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Michael King
_______________________________________________
tigers@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Tigers] Ian Spencer, James Pickard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Tigers] Reduced diameter water pump pulley, michael king |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Reduced diameter water pump pulley, michael king |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Tigers] Reduced diameter water pump pulley, michael king |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |