tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor

To: "Howard gentry" <zymmer4@yahoo.com>, "Tod Brown"
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor
From: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:40:08 -0700
It's probably a good time to remember that the CFM ratings on two barrels 
are measured using different criteria than used for quads.

A 500 CFM two barrel does not flow as much as a 500 CFM 4-barrel. The 500 
CFM two barrel would flow about the same as a 360 CFM four barrel.

Buck Trippel


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard gentry" <zymmer4@yahoo.com>
To: "Tod Brown" <todbrown@roadrunner.com>; <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor


> Hi,
>     I ran a 500CFM on my hy-po 289 in Colorado@5200 ft. elevation..It 
> worked
> like a finely mapped fuel injection system..Instant throttle response, 
> great
> milage(20) and just was a treat.
> zym
>
> The Blues is the only music Original to the United States of America.
>
> --- On Mon, 6/21/10, Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Tod Brown <todbrown@roadrunner.com>
> Subject: Re: [Tigers] Best Carburetor
> To: tigers@autox.team.net
> Date: Monday, June 21, 2010, 9:54 PM
>
>
> It's a long story, but I have been running a Holley 1850 on my tweaked
> 260 and have been thinking of changing it since the prevailing opinion
> is that it is too much carb for the 260.  One of the other carbs I have
> seen that seems like it might work is the Edelbrock 1403/1404 which is
> rated at 500 cfm.  Anybody have any experience or thoughts on this?
>
> Tod
> B3820022384LRXFE
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>