Duke
With a 347 go with the 164? bigger flywheel that the 11" clutch will fit to.
The extra size will make a long term difference with the increase in torque
you will get. You will need the bigger / later bell housing as well. It all
fits into the car.
Wally Menke
-----Original Message-----
From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of wsamouce@kc.rr.com
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:59 AM
To: TIGERS@autox.team.net
Subject: [Tigers] Balancing and flywheel confusion
I check the archives and did not find a good answer (for me) on this.
My 1991 347 has been balanced to 28 oz with a flexplate. The flexplate has
a 1" X 2" weight welded to it with some of the material drilled out. I have
a 65 6 bolt aluminum bell housing that I will have modified for my
toploader.
I have the following questions -
1. Is a 157 tooth flywheel correct for this application?
2. I want use a centerforce flywheel, which would be best?
3. Does the engine need to be re-balanced with a flywheel vs. the flexplate?
4. Do I use a 10.5 or 11" clutch?
TIA!
Duke
B382002037
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/walmenke@bigpond.net.au
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5027 (20100414) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5027 (20100414) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|