Could have been worse, FOOL FILTER would have been a good one too.
Seriously, I don't see how Mr. Millers little jab can be taken as a
smear. With all due respect to Mr. Laifman, I thought it was pretty
funny.
Frank Marrone
B9471116 (with a filter like the one Steve shows because I really don't
care one way another... on my car).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-tigers@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Tiger Mk I
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: Norman C. Miller; tigers@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: SPAM FILTER
>
>
> I have been a "lurker" on this list, and probably will
> remain so. But, this posting by the respected Norman
> Miller has given me some incentive to make a comment.
>
> While it is fair to have a difference of opinion, this
> type of response is not in the manner in which I was
> brought up.
>
> It is fine to disagree. It is not fine to cast
> unwarranted smears, such as "SPAM FILTER".
>
<snip>
|