Hmmmmm,
Many of us have PONDERED this statement that was made, I am sure that it was
intended as a COMPLIMENT, and meaning that Dan's restoration is a VERY nice
one.
I can not believe that anyone would be so stupid or cruel as to make a
derogatory remark like that, unless the final stages of Alzheimer's are
setting in, and I am SURE it was intended as KUDOS on a job well done.
We are a group to support one another not to tear others morals down..
Tom did say it well, and I guess if the statement was a negative one, then
we will have pity on a miserable sole.
Take care and have a GREAT weekend...
J.H.
> Dear Dan,
>
> I'm writing in response to Norman's cryptic note sent to the list
> yesterday. Criticism should always be viewed from multiple
> perspectives. Norman is one of the most notorious critics in this wild
and
> crazy Tiger marque domain. His friends and others on this list and
> elsewhere will attest that he is not frequently heard from and typically
> limits his criticisms to more meaningful subjects.
>
> I'll bet that you started your day, yesterday, like most, trying to
> maintain your place in life, make a living, show some progress on some
> project or other, and happened to ask an innocuous question. Instead of
> dwelling on the perceived negativism of Norman's response, consider that
> you have been named by name, and criticized by the great Norman. Before
> yesterday you were simply another name on the e-mail subscription list.
You
> somehow managed to pull the Bear from his lair. Today you are somebody in
> this Marque.
>
> Tom
>
>
|