To: | tigers@Autox.Team.Net, rande@thecia.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Tiger vs Bimmer roadster comparo |
From: | "Doug Leithauser" <dleit@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 11 Jun 1998 04:29:52 PDT |
Dammit, just because it's better does not mean we have to like it, or even admit to ourselves that it is better. You do not drive 30 year old LBC's without being stubborn! Doug Leithauser The notion that the M roadster is simply a better handling and later version of a Tiger is silly. Own up to the fact that the Bimmer is better in almost every way. So is a new Mustang GT convertible. Car designers haven't been sleeping the last 35 years |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Only of interest to those who use Microsoft Word 97 (No Tiger Content), Warwick Jones |
---|---|
Next by Date: | posting personal letters to the group time and time again???!!, Chris Richards |
Previous by Thread: | Tiger vs Bimmer roadster comparo, Rande Bellman |
Next by Thread: | Re: 30 years with a Tiger, Chris Richards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |