tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Steam holes

To: anitabrt@mindspring.com, tigers@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Steam holes
From: Spook37211@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
In a message dated 97-09-09 21:40:36 EDT, anitabrt@mindspring.com writes:

<<  I di >>
 >Do these 'steam' holes correspond with the lozenge shaped holes on the
intake
 >side of the head?  Are they the equivalent of the small hole just over the
 >bore in the 289-302 block?
 >Ray
 
 Small 1/8" holes similar to the 289 steam holes.  Locate holes locations
with
  new 351W head gasket as the templet.
 Jim Barrett Tiger II 351C and others
 >
  >>
Jim,
At one time, Shelby as well as Ford Muscleparts recommended plugging the
small holes in the 289 block for coolant circulation control at higher RPM's.
My block is a later 302, so I suspect that the reason I noticed no difference
is that the block holes were apparently common after late 75 or so.
I must say that I don't think that this is really a needed modification,
though, since I ran the same heads on a 5 bolt 289 block as well as a late
260 block bored to 4.00" (no mail please, I've already heard that it 'can't
be done'....) with no apparent effect on cooling.
Anybody else do the same thing?
Regards, Ray  

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>