Tom, your simple solution is great for the specialized group of people "who
just wanna have fun...etc. "
However it does nothing for those of us who would like , if we're gonna
have a certification program at all, to have it agreed upon and
administered with representation from ALL involved persons, Tiger clubs, etc.
BTW, while I'm posting this, you made the statement to me that: ( and I got
it right this time 'cause I did a cut and paste... )
> " From the outset, I believe that the assembly process began with
>>different "build tickets" for Alpines and Tigers. If you spend the time
>>looking, the differences are subtle but obvious. There are different parts
>>on the base shells. I'm not going to tell you where to look, but its not a
>>matter for agreement or dissagreement."
Tom, if it's really that "cut and dried",......no if's , ands, or but's,
then it should be EASY to get consensus from other clubs, etc. At that
point we'd all have an _ agreed upon_ standard !
Then, of course, you'd still have the issue of; how much deviation from
the standard is still considered a real Tiger, how much isn't...... but
that problem could be worked, with participation from ALL who will be
affected....
Rick Fedorchak
>
>I have a potential solution for those of you who "just want to have fun and
>preserve the Marque" When you relocate the sheetmetal parts to make your
>"rebody" simply leave the Alpine Identification on the cowl. We are happy
>to see Tigers saved in this manner. I promise the Alpine tags will not
>interfere with your enjoyment nor will they detract from the performance.
>To make things even better, it's totally legal in all states. This is
>such a gloriously simple idea, I'm not sure why I haven't proposed it
>before. A real win - win solution.
>
|