You people who don't see the value of this program are hopeless!
Ramon
rs11@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
Nah, not hopeless, just TACtless!
Jeff
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[4]: The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and san
Author: "Spontelli, Ramon" <rs11@ElSegundoCA.NCR.COM> at INTERNET
Date: 3/14/97 11:48 AM
> I hope you are joking about the attached note saying the tags have
> non-original rivets. If the TAC expert said that your Tigers are the
> real thing based on their examination of characteristics only
> bona-fide Tigers have, what is the point of a note saying the tags
> aren't held on by 'original rivets'?. Does this note say if screws,
> bolts, nuts etc. are original or not? To TAC or not to TAC, that is
> the question?
No. I'm not joking. That's what it says on my two certificates. I guess
what it means is that they are certifying that my cars are Tigers, but maybe
not the Tigers indicated by the ID tags, even though I have the original
transmissions, the original rear-ends, and the original valve covers with the
original engine-number tags.
Maybe one of the TAC guys can verify, but I think some confusion was
introduced by an earlier post that mentioned the original rivets.
Hell, the day they did mine, they certified a car that didn't even have any
tags, AND they cross-referenced his tranny and/or rear-end numbers and told
the guy what his numbers should be!
You people who don't see the value of this program are hopeless!
Ramon
rs11@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
|