tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 260 Vs. 289

To: tigers@Autox.Team.Net, deldredge@acl.nyit.edu
Subject: Re: 260 Vs. 289
From: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 97 14:50:51 PST
     This must BE OUR PAYBACK for all the discussions a few days ago about 
     a "stock" 1966 TIGER with a 289!


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: 260 Vs. 289
Author:  deldredge@acl.nyit.edu at ~INTERNET
Date:    1/30/97 2:29 PM


     
     
 I have recently acquired what I believe to be a 1967 Tiger with 
the VIN 382001816.  I have been told that it has a 289, not a 260.
Is this accurate.  The Tiger does have the small Chrysler emblem on front 
right and says Sunbeam V-8 on the back.  Thanks.
     
   Deldredge@acl.nyit.edu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>