To: | bradshaw@utdallas.edu, LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com, tigers@autox.team.net, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) |
From: | HW200@aol.com |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:43:27 -0500 (EST) |
I understand the Chevy Monza situation, my point is: How did Chevrolet and the dealerships represent the engine size to the consumer? Perhaps my 351ci substitition analogy in a modern Mustang is far fetched, but how would you feel if you were told you were getting one engine and you got another instead, wouldn't there be a huge liability issue present?- Hank |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1967 MK II for Sale, Todd Rayson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), LeBrun |
Previous by Thread: | Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Harold Hartsell |
Next by Thread: | Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), LeBrun |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |