To: | "cfchrist@earthlink.net" <cfchrist@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: FW: Re: Tach reduction gear |
Date: | Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:40:45 -0800 |
Cc: | "spridgets@autox.team.net" <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=U9rm2cb+HGGhQb4cxAbcZx6zAh+s34sWnvE4lhLPqeHF/dxguHy6WKLZcYaFjH8l; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
References: | <410-220062510131024300@earthlink.net> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
cfchrist@earthlink.net wrote: >it would make sense that the only difrence in the tachometers designed to be >used with the tach drive would be the maximum available reading on gauge face. > > > >so the reduction unit corrects of what diameter pulley is on the generator > Well, that certainly makes sense even to a bonehead such as myself. I went to the parts manual, and it does not indicate any production changes to either the "ratio box" (what we call the tach reduction gear), the tachometer itself, or the generator pulley. I suspect that it all means that Donald Healey came to realize that the original Smith's tach reduction gear supplied with the Sprite could not be repaired outside the Smith's factory and it was therefore subject to an early re-design. What surprises me is that Donald Healey, who was noted for using parts from other marques, would have a purpose-built "ratio box". Buster Evans |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: A40 starting problem semi solved, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Humor, Listers, No LBC, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: FW: Re: Tach reduction gear, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Tach reduction gear, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |