spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget

To: Mark Hineline <hineline@ocotillofield.net>
Subject: Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:21:42 -0500
Cc: Spridget List <spridgets@autox.team.net>
References: <db70ed736ebeb020f60950b1c560f2a1@ocotillofield.net>
The other reason may be to compensate for the power loss due to  
increasing emissions equipment requirements.
Cheers,
Mike Thompson

On Jan 3, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Mark Hineline wrote:

> The official reasoning behind dropping the Triumph 1500 into the  
> rubber-bumper Midget in '75, if I recall correctly, was that the  
> increased displacement was needed to compensate for the increased  
> weight of the fittings.
>
> I've never bought that explanation, although there might be some  
> truth in it. I've always suspected that BL was looking for a cost  
> advantage. (All their other 1275 production was in front-wheel  
> drive vehicles.)
>
> What would the cost be, in acceleration and top speed, of dropping  
> a 1275 into a RB car?
>
> Mark




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>