To: | Dbcooper292@aol.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: No LBC - 4WD vs AWD |
Date: | Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:27:11 -0500 |
Cc: | bkitterer@mac.com, spridgets@autox.team.net |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YKRD+xNBfz7Fti8vZJQvGfs2zE/FEWmqefmirwiliZRJiWfBZ3UHnCRkSpIYKDzeDmYkt7S5c8SKFbSm0n1RU7UhabkSuG616U8iledLLsbR34CoLofz5zjuhoQSisohFp0zapcifhJIf+zq0A3sgZWKRrN5vx/kCR2MW/3hpNI= |
References: | <7e.717f1113.305dd0a0@aol.com> j8HKTLvH029617 |
Also not entirely true. I have seen plenty of both types go Tango Uniform when the going gets tough. This has a LOT more to to with the person driving the vehicle than the drive train. It is just as easy to over drive a 4WD as it is to overdrive an AWD. If you see more of one type or the other, it is because that type of vehicle appeals to drivers who buy a vehicle based on a TV commercial and believe that the vehicle will allow them to drive in a blizzard the same as they would on a dry summer day. On 9/17/05, Dbcooper292@aol.com <Dbcooper292@aol.com> wrote: > > 2) 4wd is what hunters use. AWD is the system used on all the SUVs I see > tits up in a ditch while I drive by in my focus in a blizzard. > > Mark M > ================================= = Never offend people with style when you = = can offend with substance --- Sam Brown = ================================= |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: No LBC - 4WD vs AWD, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: No LBC - 4WD vs AWD, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: No LBC - 4WD vs AWD, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: No LBC - 4WD vs AWD, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |