In a message dated 06/03/2000 6:36:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca writes:
<< You're slipping! >>
NOPE, Robert. Wanted to make SURE you got a least one!!<G>
<< I got 2 copies of this! ( You did a 'reply to all'. )>>
Had it been on the "mgs" List, would been three!! Doubling up again!
<< Actually, I'm guessing that my car is currently worth less ( not worthless
)
than originally appraised, given it's disassembled state.>>
Even "disassembled" it will NOT go down!! It's ain't no J*p piece o'sh*t,
nor Irish, nor US - where ALL of new cars create a "hit in the pocket book".
<<Mind you, I have paid out more dollars than it is insured for >>
Then YOU are falling (at a HIGH rate of speed) into a "insurance lull".
The car HAS "appreciated", the parts have "appreciated", your labor value has
"appreciated".
Just explain to me how you are gonna replace the car, the labor, the parts;
when car is UNDER insured (please)!!
KEY word here, folks, is REPLACE!! If my own case, no, Hortense CANNOT be
"replaced". BUT, if there was a MAJOR catastrophic
prob. - I get a check for what it would cost to buy a car and return to level
of what she is AS OF TODAY, not when I "stole" her, not when I fixed her,
etc..
Robert, IMVHO, your $4500 would SUCK!! for a check with the note
"Claim Paid In Full as per Policy #............." !!
And with this note, as well as the (...you're slipping...reply to all...)
one, actually I had hit just reply. Had to go back ad add the List.
(so there<G>)!!
Cheers...............
Ed
|