spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Shorter column was Re: .85 cent parts

To: ulix@u.washington.edu
Subject: Shorter column was Re: .85 cent parts
From: Daniel1312@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 16:06:57 EDT
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
Reply-to: Daniel1312@aol.com
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
In a message dated 28/4/1999  4:08:08PM,  ulix@u.washington.edu writes:

<< Daniel,
 I was going to do that, but I couldn't see how to shorten it without
 losing the sliding contact for the horn.  Did you retain this contact?
 
     Ulix                 >>

Hi Ulix,

I had the column shortened nearer the base by a company that are expert in 
shortening propshafts!  I think that the cut and pinned it and then welded it 
up.  There are I guess numerous ways to safely cut'n'shut the column (this 
the column in a 69 car).  I would have preferred to have the bottom end of 
the column cut and a fresh clamp welded on but the original clamp is friction 
welded or whatever.  

It is necessary to shorten the indicator shroud and bend the indicator stalk 
straight and stuff like that too.

The horn contacts and all the fancy machining and splining at the end of the 
column remain untouched.


Daniel1312

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Shorter column was Re: .85 cent parts, Daniel1312 <=