To: | mhanna@ball.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: 1.5" SUs |
From: | David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 1998 16:40:55 -0500 (EST) |
Cc: | Spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
In-reply-to: | <53654725144FD111A24100805F57DEC00200FB3C@aeromsg2.ball.com>(mhanna@ball.com) |
Reply-to: | David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu> |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
I was just looking at dyno charts in Vizard's book. The results were (don't recall what engine, 1275 or bored 1400) that the Weber 45 was best above 5000 rpm and the 1.75 SU was better below 5000 rpm, although the spread at any rpm was no more than 5hp or so. The dual 1.5 SUs were slightly worse. I have heard that a new HIF6 SU is expensive, and it has the throttle shaft bearing problem. On this limited evidence I would say the Weber is the way to go. Availability of manifolds might be another issue. Anybody have more info? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | first post, 948 question, Epstein73 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: book review, Richard L. Bergstrom |
Previous by Thread: | RE: 1.5" SUs, Hanna, Mark |
Next by Thread: | Re: 1.5" SUs, Ron Soave |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |