| To: | Larry and Sandi Miller <millerls@email.msn.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Rough 1500 HP calculations |
| From: | Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 1997 13:47:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | Spridgets <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net> |
| Organization: | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
| References: | <0403c20241709c7UPIMSSMTPUSR01@email.msn.com> |
| Reply-to: | Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
For those of you who might be interested, I plugged some figures for the
1500 into Bruce Bowling's rough HP calculator just for kicks:
Dsplcmt/Bore Comp Engine RPM HP
------------ ---- ---------- ----
1489.4 (std) 7.5 (std) 5250 65
" 9.0 " 78
1500 (.010") 7.5 " 66
" 9.0 " 79
1520 (.020") 7.5 " 66
" 9.0 " 80
1531 (.030") 7.5 " 67
" 9.0 " 80
Bruce is sure to warn the user that these are "extreme rough ballpark"
figures only, for power is certainly a product of more factors than RPM,
compression, and engine displacement. I tweaked the engine RPM factor
to get 65hp out of the stock setup and then altered the other values as
I went down.
At any rate it gives some interesting values - it basically says that
you get nearly no power increase from boring out the cylinders on a 1500
block, at least compared with a simple switch to higher compression
pistons.
Thanks to Larry Miller for pointing out this page!!
e
-- ___
__.o,\____ * Eric Mumford * ('v') -> BA-KUK!
/__ \ / _ ) * mumford@rpi.edu * (( ))
(+)`---(+) * http://travolta.stu.rpi.edu * --"---"--o
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: aftermarket seat, Amy Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 1976 pistons compatible with 1979?, Eric Mumford |
| Previous by Thread: | aftermarket seats, Shawn J. Tobin |
| Next by Thread: | 1976 pistons compatible with 1979?, Eric Mumford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |