| To: | davebrown1@earthlink.net, spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New engine volume from over-boring? |
| From: | Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Dec 1997 00:15:41 -0500 |
| Organization: | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
| References: | <348878FB.755A672C@rpi.edu> <34888380.9DA97830@earthlink.net> <34888D12.7C281BBC@rpi.edu> <3488C36D.80BC0B7@earthlink.net> <3488C616.B9C915FC@rpi.edu> <3488D956.2B9F3898@earthlink.net> <3488DC6C.C35A65DD@rpi.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Eric Mumford <mumford@rpi.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
At any rate, if we assume that the "REAL" volume of the 1500 block is in fact 1489.3798cc rather than 1493 based on a bore of 2.9" diameter and a stroke of 3.440", then boring out would yield.. 0.010" over - 1499.669cc (a "real" 1500) 0.020" over - 1509.994cc (a "peppy" 1500) 0.030" over - 1520.354cc (a 1500 with "kick") 0.040" over - 1530.749cc (as close to 1600 as you're gonna git) whew! my TI's sweatin'! :) e -- __.o,\____ Go, Lil' Racer! * Eric C. Mumford /__ \ / _ ) 1979 MG Midget * mumford@rpi.edu (+)`---(+) http://travolta.stu.rpi.edu |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3 point belts, Ron Soave |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3 point belts, Daryl May |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New engine volume from over-boring?, Ulix Goettsch |
| Next by Thread: | 3 point belts, Ron Soave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |