spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

You sah! I say! (Re: British Car owership)

To: spitfires list <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: You sah! I say! (Re: British Car owership)
From: public@sweavo.34sp.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:19:55 +0000
Quoting Dave Gebhard <kimkell@decaturnet.com>:

> The Laws for British Sports Cars
> LAW OF PECULIAR RANDOM NOMENCLATURE
> "The name of a British sports car shall consist primarily of letters and
> numbers, with said letters and numbers chosen in random fashion so that
> the resultant vehicle name is totally devoid of any meaning." This law
> explains why British cars have spectacularly bad names, like "EType", or
> worse yet, "MGB-GT."

I have to take issue with this.  MG made the MG A then the MG B.  Jaguar's E-
type was after the ... er... D type?!  Eminently sensible naming scheme.  
Conversely, what are the relationships between a Cobra and a Dodge Viper?  Or a 
Ford Mustang and a Mitsubishi Colt?

Note, I'm sweeping under the carpet the fact that the MkI spitfire was called 
the "Spitfire 4" as opposed to the Spitfire Mk IV which was a very different 
beast.

But the other two are spot on!  Especially the masochism.  This is related to a 
rule to look out for in classified ads for cars.  Positive terms normally 
reflect a level of surprise or compensatory self-delusion on the part of the 
seller.  Owners of the classic Mini will tell you:

"They corner like they're on rails" -> you can't get it to go fast enough to 
skid
"Practical" -> bits fall off all the time, but I just tape them back on
"Reliable" -> One of the bits I taped back on has stayed on for over a month now
"Great Runabout" -> Wouldn't risk going over 40 miles in one go
"Fun" -> "Really Uncomfortable" (to drive)





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • You sah! I say! (Re: British Car owership), public <=