spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Battery problem

To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Battery problem
From: "Greg Rowe" <growe58@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:57:31 -0500
It's actually not a brace.  It's designed to catch on a bracket
on the firewall in case of a head on accident to prevent the bonnet
from driving backwards into the passenger compartment.  Without the
bracket, you really have no reason to keep the brace.

I don't know what size battery Triumph originally used in the later
models.  I do know that a lot of people buy a smaller size battery
than 'The Book' says to avoid contact with the brace.

Greg Rowe



>From: "Ken C" <sdspitfire@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: "Ken C" <sdspitfire@sbcglobal.net>
>To: "Spit Elist" <spitfires@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Battery problem
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:35:51 -0800
>
>An interesting problem with my 'hybrid' 1972 MK IV which is just about 
>ready
>to go back on the road.  I'm using a bonnet from a '79. The new bonnet has
>additional cross-bracing up around the outside corners. One brace falls
>ever-so-nicely right on the battery positive terminal. Not a good thing ! I
>turned the battery 180 degrees, same problem, different part of the brace. 
>I
>guess I could remove the brace, the original '72 bonnet didn't have it. 
>But,
>a question, what kind of battery came with the '79's and didn't have this
>problem ? Side-terminal ? Or am I just missing something ?
>
>TIA ... Ken C


_________________________________________________________________

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>