spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: new cars - non lbc

To: "Bowen, Patrick" <pbowen@intellinetics.com>
Subject: Re: new cars - non lbc
From: "Livia I. Haasper" <wilivhaasper@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:19:54 -0500
My comments,
guess who pays for some of the warranty labour?
Some manufacturers down load some of the labour repair times onto the dealers,
who then, in turn, expect the mechanics/auto body repair crew, to absorb the
cost.
 Sometimes the allowed repair times are simply cut in half, so the crew is
expected to work for less.
My 2 cents.
Liv

"Bowen, Patrick" wrote:

> <Joe Curry said>
>
> I have a lot of thoughts!  The first one is, "Why is that warranty
> necessary?"  The answer is the same as it was for Chrysler back in the 60's
> (I
> think, it may have been the 70's).  That is because it is necessary in order
> to offset the reputation for poor reliability!
>
> <end>
>
> Or perhaps it is an effective marketing ploy to increase its market share by
> demonstrating an added value that other car makers are not willing to offer.
> Lets face it, if the manufacture thought they would be repairing these
> things constantly up to 100,000 miles they would lose money.  They base it
> on the fact that they believe they won't have to fix them.
>
> If you have a faulty product do you warranty it for longer or for shorter?
>
> Patrick Bowen
>
> /

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>