spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: nuisance undercoating

To: <Thearthurhsmith@cs.com>, <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: nuisance undercoating
From: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:04:00 -0800
Think I'll pass on the MEK.  I'd rather live with the undercoating than with
emphysema or whatever.  I'll try some of that PPG stuff that JC mentioned.

Thanks

Jeff in San Diego
'67 RHD Spitfire Mk3 aka "Mrs. Jones"
Jeff's Classic '67 Spitfire Mk3 site
http://www.ohms.com/spitfire/spitfire.shtml
home of the NEW Totally Triumph Auction
"By Triumph enthusiasts, for Triumph enthusiasts"
http://www.ohms.com/cgi-bin/TRauction.cgi
----- Original Message -----
From: <Thearthurhsmith@cs.com>
To: <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: nuisance undercoating


>
> In a message dated 3/29/00 7:04:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> pficklin@qnis.net writes:
>
> > Be   R-E-A-L-L-Y   careful with MEK - it's almost "cancer-in-a-can"...
>
> WRONG   BE  R-E-A-L-L-Y   R-E-A-L-L-Y   R-E-A-L-L-Y   CAREFUL  and if you
use
> it wear the gas mask and gloves that won't dissolve.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>