To: | "'Joe Curry'" <spitlist@gte.net>, Suzie <suzie_bear@hotmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Optional Extras |
From: | "Bowen, Patrick A RP2" <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil> |
Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2000 12:02:47 -0500 |
I don't know on MK IIIs but I do know on the first spits made it was an option, or more correctly it was an option not to have one. In fact when Spitfires were first rolled out for their Car show debute the cars that were sent could not be unloaded from the ships. So two cars were brought from Hawaii and some other tropical place. Caused a big problem as the car show was in January and in New York and Chicago. The book that I recieved this out of said that cars sent to tropica markets (you decipher exactly what that pertains to) did not have heaters. If someone whats the name of the book I can get it at home. Pulling from memory but, if we need more exact info I can look tonight. Patrick Bowen -----Original Message----- From: Joe Curry [mailto:spitlist@gte.net] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 10:13 AM To: Suzie Cc: Spit List Subject: Re: Optional Extras I think he is mistaken! Isn't it wonderful how the memory plays tricks on you! Joe Suzie wrote: > > I was at the local TSSC meet last night & one guy was talking about the > brand new Spitfire Mk III he bought in 1969 - with the 'optional' heater > included. > > Even allowing for exporting such a large proportion of the Spitfires how on > earth could Triumph make a *British* car with heater *optional*??? > > Suzie -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Optional Extras, nikolai jaremka |
---|---|
Next by Date: | prejudice, Fred Thomas |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Optional Extras, nikolai jaremka |
Next by Thread: | Optional Extras, John & Judy Tones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |