spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mk IV Engine

To: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougbert@rcn.com>,
Subject: Re: Mk IV Engine
From: Atwell Haines <carbuff@nac.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 20:48:10 -0400
Doug,


FYI the emissions testing procedure for pre-1981 cars will remain the same
with NJ's new testing rules.   Only the wait in the line will be longer!!

Cheers,

Atwell Haines
'79 Spitfire [Waiting 5 more years to install those Webers & Headers!]


At 09:02 PM 7/8/99 -0500, Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou wrote:
>
>What would the effect of these various modes be on emissions testing?
>Here in NJ, they test just HC and CO at idle (although this might
>change in the near future).  I suspect that increased compression
>would cause more NO emission, but they don't test for that.  But
>a more agressive cam would probably cause more HC, becuse of the greater
>valve timing overlap.  Does this sound right?
>
>Thanks again,
>
>Doug
>
>At 01:36 PM 7/8/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>Doug,
>>The 1300 (mkIV) is essentially the same engine as the 1500 with a
>>shorter stroke.  That stroke makes it mush more able to sustain higher
>>rpms than the 1500 which has better low end torque.  There are piston
>>sets that will get the compression ratio up to 9:1 but as long as you
>>are at it, go ahead and add a mild cam and exhaust header with free flow
>>exhaust system.  And lose the ZS carb.  I prefer twin SU's (as I have
>>previously stated) but the down draft Weber is also a good choice.  Stay
>>away from a single side draft Weber because of manifold design
>>limitations.
>>
>>With all that, you should have a nice performing Spit at a price of
>>little more than a normal engine rebuild.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Joe Curry
>>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Mk IV Engine, Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou
    • Re: Mk IV Engine, Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou
    • Re: Mk IV Engine, Atwell Haines <=