Michael Burdick wrote:
>
> Joe Curry wrote:
>
> > In theory, the mentioned wear would be from the force of the crank being
> > pushed against the thrust washer. Although, I think the problem is
> > minimal.
>
> Hi Joe - let me respectfully say "I'm not so sure about that". The force
> pushing against the thrust washers when the clutch is disengaged is not
> insignificant (the clutch pedal is a pretty good lever arm), and the
> application of this force very often occurs after the oil has had plenty
> of time to drain back into the pan. A high load with minimal lubrication
> could very well lead to premature wear. I always start my engine with my
> foot off of the clutch pedal - I've already rebuilt my engine twice (once
> the right way!) and am not in any hurry to do it again. Too many other
> projects waiting!
Not to say the pressure is minimal, but rather the duration that the
effect occurs is. Although I suppose the fact that most Triumphs are
not "daily drivers", there probably is ample time for the oil to drain
off the thrust washers into the oil pan; giving the dry surface you
mention. You're probably right that it is better to err on the side of
caution.
>
> Hope you're liking AZ - I actually bought my Spitfire when I lived there
> 11 years ago. No body rust, but everything else was in pretty bad
> shape...
So far so good. Although I'm sure I will like it much more when I get
into my own place and can spread out all the Spitfire stuff I brought
from Washington.
Regards,
Joe
--
"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
-- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
|