And with that, the discussion ends.
There is no way to argue when all the rules of argument are discarded.
Regards,
Jon Heese
Paul L Fisher wrote:
> Oh no! Here we go.
>
> It doesn't take any more faith to believe creation than evolution.
>
>
> Paul L Fisher
>
> Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com
> Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Ian Fisher
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 5:38 PM
> To: bd nesbit; Bill Strobel; shotimes
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming
>
> Young earth as in creationism? Just because you believe in one theory
> doesn't mean that "another ain't so".
>
> Ian
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: bd nesbit <bdnesbit@sc.rr.com>
> To: Bill Strobel <theamcguy@yahoo.com>; shotimes <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2006 6:07:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming
>
>
> How do you know that this planet has been around for millions of years? I
> do not believe that it has been here that long. I happen to believe in a
> "young earth" theory. Please don't go into the carbon dating or argon gas
> dating and that 'crap'. It just ain't so.
> Thanks,
> David
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Strobel" <theamcguy@yahoo.com>
> To: "Times List SHO" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 3:10 PM
> Subject: [Shotimes] Global Warming
>
>
>> The issue isn't whether the planet is changing or not, the issue should be
>
>> what to do about it. First off fossil evidence tells me that at one time,
>
>> in Canada, where there is now ice and snow, there use used to be lush
>> vegetation and the area was inhabited by large cold blooded animals.
>> Second geological evidence, tells me Pittsburgh PA was once covered by a
>> glacier hundreds of meters thick. Which earth is the one we should be
>> preserving? The planet changes, it has done so for millions of years
>> without mans interference what makes anyone think that a few hundred years
>
>> of mans interference is going to accelerate or slow down what has occurred
>
>> naturally in the past. Greenies look out and say the temp is rising, we
>> must be at fault, we must react, when ample evidence shows that at one
>> time Canada was a tropical forest. Could the planet just be trying to go
>> back to that point and we just happen to be living while it is doing it?
>> Outlawing planet change will not work, the
>> earth can't read. Instead of wasting time trying to stop the inevitable
>> and figuring out who or who isn't the blame, time and resources would be
>> better spent trying to figure the impact of the change and what benefits
>> and consequences we need to plan for in the future. The earth will
>> change, man can not stop it. Better to adapt than die. The earth has
>> experienced both ice ages and periods of great warmth. Trying to preserve
>
>> a 20-40 year climate period (1930-1970) in a planet that has seen vast
>> extremes in its millions of years of existence is ludicrous.
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
>> rates starting at 1"/min.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Shotimes mailing list
>> Shotimes@autox.team.net
>> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
|