LOL - LOTS of metaphysics - NO help on my front mail seal! <G>
It's going back together now - timing belt's on and adjusted...
mm in sunny FL
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Paul L Fisher
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 6:22 PM
To: 'bd nesbit'; 'shotimes'
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Global Warming
Amen. 6,000 years.
Paul L Fisher
Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com Amsoil dealer:
http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of bd nesbit
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 5:08 PM
To: Bill Strobel; shotimes
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming
How do you know that this planet has been around for millions of years? I
do not believe that it has been here that long. I happen to believe in a
"young earth" theory. Please don't go into the carbon dating or argon gas
dating and that 'crap'. It just ain't so.
Thanks,
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Strobel" <theamcguy@yahoo.com>
To: "Times List SHO" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 3:10 PM
Subject: [Shotimes] Global Warming
> The issue isn't whether the planet is changing or not, the issue
> should be
> what to do about it. First off fossil evidence tells me that at one
> time,
> in Canada, where there is now ice and snow, there use used to be lush
> vegetation and the area was inhabited by large cold blooded animals.
> Second geological evidence, tells me Pittsburgh PA was once covered by
> a glacier hundreds of meters thick. Which earth is the one we should
> be preserving? The planet changes, it has done so for millions of
> years without mans interference what makes anyone think that a few
> hundred years
> of mans interference is going to accelerate or slow down what has
> occurred
> naturally in the past. Greenies look out and say the temp is rising,
> we must be at fault, we must react, when ample evidence shows that at
> one time Canada was a tropical forest. Could the planet just be
> trying to go back to that point and we just happen to be living while it
is doing it?
> Outlawing planet change will not work, the earth can't read. Instead
> of wasting time trying to stop the inevitable and figuring out who or
> who isn't the blame, time and resources would be better spent trying
> to figure the impact of the change and what benefits and consequences
> we need to plan for in the future. The earth will change, man can not
> stop it. Better to adapt than die. The earth has experienced both
> ice ages and periods of great warmth. Trying to preserve
> a 20-40 year climate period (1930-1970) in a planet that has seen
> vast extremes in its millions of years of existence is ludicrous.
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
|