To: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Shop-talk] Socket marking? (and a quick 'why?) |
From: | John Miller <jem@milleredp.com> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:04:33 -0700 |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | shop-talk@autox.team.net |
References: | <OFC530960F.1A788BD5-ON852585AF.00562258-852585AF.0056F20E@mail.megageek.com> <1UWD4ixk3H.1bMiV2mQfKg@johns-desktop> <CAG1pxgbmCAo4ssRRQ6Ehp=UeVDXP=NQEkUrofy7fhCqNftWvdQ@mail.gmail.com> <e2024a63-adb5-99fe-ec08-345e112f357f@comcast.net> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 7/24/2020 1:39 PM, Mike Sinclair wrote: > I agree. I've had my S-K sockets since the 50s and they are as good as > new. Well, not quite, but readable and usable. And I've used a lot of > torque a few times. I've got a bunch of S-K mid-length sockets purchased in the early '80s and they're incredibly useful. I've got this 20yo Facom torque wrench (same corporate parent as SK I think) and (a) it's marked only in Frog and (b) its ratchet has decided it doesn't want to be reversed. It's basically just occupying space in the tool drawer now. John. _______________________________________________ Shop-talk@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.96 Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk http://autox.team.net/archive Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/shop-talk/mharc@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] Leaf blower issues...need the elders' advice, Brian Kemp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Shop-talk] Leaf blower issues...need the elders' advice, Jeff Scarbrough |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] Socket marking? (and a quick 'why?), Mike Sinclair |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Shop-talk] Socket marking? (and a quick 'why?), David Scheidt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |