> I mostly just wanted to make the point that this isn't a defect in the
> mail list
> software, nor does it have anything to do with the way the return
> addresses are
> supplied (the "reply-all" question). The problem arises from an
> interaction
> between your mail software, and the message that was sent.
I agree that it is not the mail list software, but again, not to point
fingers, but it must be said, it is caused by users that are handling
their mail through gateways that are munging headers.
It is not the fault of the receiver in any way.
|