To prove false advertising or bait-and-switch wouldn't you have to prove
they intentionally deceived the public on a regular basis? I think that the
key word is "intentionally," and the shop in question is already claiming
honest stupidity. Harry
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Hanberg <steve@oldsub.com>
To: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Truck Shop Complaint
> It sure sounds like they are guilty of false advertising.
>
> I had a law professor tell me once exactly what language to use to make
sure
> a retailer understood you felt the had violated consumer protection laws.
I
> no longer remember, but I do remember what my lawyer charges by the hour.
>
> I'd just quit buying from them. Its a lot better use of your time and
> money.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan Horvath" <alan@alanhorvath.com>
> To: "Ryan Sain" <rsain@gte.net>
> Cc: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Truck Shop Complaint
>
>
> Ryan Sain wrote:
>
> > I'll delete names and send it to them if no one else has.
>
> I wonder if they ever read their email??? If they don't pay attention
> to their web site ...
>
> They need to understand that a web site is PUBLISHED info -- just like
> a newspaper or printed catalog -- they could be sued for false
> advertising, I believe.
>
> Alan
> http://AlanHorvath.com/54chevy/
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|