Gary,
Thanks for the info(that was quick).
If the engine would bolt up(I don't have a welder), it sounds like it would
be a good substitution for my tired 216.
Dave Camp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radicic, Gary" <RadicicG@osc.army.mil>
To: "'nateley'" <nateley@email.msn.com>; <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 7:07 AM
Subject: RE: [oletrucks] INLINE SIX OPTIONS
> Dave,
> Just so happens that I am sitting here with a 1970 Motors Manual... , page
> 2-120, says that six cyl engines available in 1964 were 194 cu, 120 hp;230
cu,
> 140 hp and 230 cu, 155 hp. all were 1B, bore on 120 hp was 3.5635" where
as bore
> on 140 and 155 hp were 3.875". All strokes were 3.25", compression 8.5;
...Not
> sure what contributed to the 155 hp, perhaps cam?
>
> Don't know about inter connect-ability....in a fine AD Truck! :)
>
> Gary
>
> Gary Radicic
> 1950 Chev 3604
> Geneseo, IL
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nateley [mailto:nateley@email.msn.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 7:30 AM
> To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
> Subject: [oletrucks] INLINE SIX OPTIONS
>
>
> I met a guy at a local car show yesterday who had just replaced the inline
6
> in his Biscayne with a V8. He is not sure of the size of the 6, but said
it
> ran well and was low mileage(60K). Does anyone know what sixes were
original
> with a 64 Biscayne and if they would bolt up to my 49 3600? Would it bolt
up
> to my stock 4-speed tranny?
> Thanks,
> Dave Camp
>
>
>
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|